Textual Rhetorical Analysis - 949 Words

Textual Rhetorical Analysis John Fire Lame Deer was a Sioux Indian tribal leader, medicine man, rodeo clown, and storyteller amongst other things. A selection from his autobiography Seeker Of Visions: The Life Of A Sioux Medicine Man titled â€Å"Talking to the Owls and Butterflies† is a short piece regarding nature and man’s relationship with it. The piece was intended to make an impression on white people in order to help salvage what is remaining in the environment. Lame Deer reprimands the â€Å"white world† for its negative outlook towards nature and the treatment of animals, he converses how man has changed and reshaped nature in order to make it more profitable. Stating that Caucasians have gone and altered animals in order to create†¦show more content†¦The article primarily appeals to individuals with interest in global warming. The main point that Wood focuses on is the idea of sulfur-aerosol injection, in which sulfur dioxide would be pumped into the sky. However, there are several issues with this concept that he addresses in his article. The first issue that is addressed is the possibility of acid rain and severe climate shifts. Geophysicists argue that while the idea would work, catastrophic failures would incur if the sulfur dioxide were ever to stop pumping into the atmosphere. Wood lists several downfalls of this system, almost in an intimidating manner. He makes the downfalls seem horrendous to the benefits. However, Wood also completely disregards the other alternative ideas for solving global warming. From painted skies to carbon-eating trees, the only concept discussed in depth is the sulfur dioxide idea. This raises concerns as the idea he appears to support the most also happens to be the idea that he discusses the atrocious downfalls of. What is interesting about this paper is the author’s purpose. It seems as though he is attempting to raise awareness and support geophysics. However, all the points he brings up to discuss he quickly refutes with dangers. This confuses the reader as the article is more intimidating rather than informational. The overwhelming sense of danger associated with eachShow MoreRelatedTextual Analysis of Rudy Giulianis Speech873 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿Textual Analysis of Rudy Giulianis Speech Giulianis Purpose and Argument The year 2001, September 11th happened to be a disastrous day for New York City  in America together with all countries worldwide. The calculated attack by terrorists stirred several reactions that were apparent in varied art forms. Other people mourned those who died using poems and songs while other individuals called for urgent action in form of speeches together with letters. One specific rejoinder was the speech fromRead MoreWatching the Watchmen Essay937 Words   |  4 PagesWatching the Watchmen While reading Watchmen with the purpose of textual analysis, there are many different things to consider. Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons took many original approaches to the typical super hero story when formulating this novel. Watchmen is a story about a group of outlawed super heroes in New York City. The story lines and backgrounds of particular characters are shown during the comic, and we see how different these characters are from the stories of typical super heroesRead MoreThe Application Of Genre Analysis And Phraseology836 Words   |  4 PagesThe application of genre analysis and phraseology has great potential to inform this kind of research and practice, enabling us to receive a more thorough understanding of how language is used in a particular context and/or in a particular genre. In this study, the textual analysis included inter-rater reliability analysis performed by two university instructors to code a portion of the texts. The analysis reached a satisfactory leve l of agreement in the four internal sections in the main study.Read MoreThe And Food For The Poor Charity Essay1551 Words   |  7 Pagesentity is and what they do in the world. This message can be delivered with multiple layers that are developed through very specific textual and contextual details and knowledge to help create an image of the organization. The THON philanthropy and Food For The Poor charity both deliver rhetorical messages though their logos which utilize both similar and opposing rhetorical ideals to convey their messages about the specific organizations. A comparison of the 2015 THON logo and the Food For The Poor logoRead MoreMistrys First Person Narrative: Indian Nationalism Disguised as Wistful Recollection.794 Words   |  3 PagesHowever, a rhetorical analysis of the speaker in the essay, which as mentioned is a first person autobiographical narrative lead us to an agenda that is hidden below the surface: Indian nationalism and pride. This is not to insinuate that the author has some hidden, malevolent agenda to thrust Indian nationalism upon the reader. Rather, the tools of rhetorical analysis reveal the subtle undertones of the essay in a manner that perhaps even the author is not full conscious of. Rhetorical analysis dependsRead MoreMy Writing For Writing A Writing Intensive Course1228 Words   |  5 Pag esspecific rhetorical choices of academic writers, which may include genre, format, evidence, citation, style, and organization† and the fourth goal is to â€Å"develop an awareness of and preparedness for the writing they will do in their majors through research, exploration, and/or practice of the discourse community’s conventions.† The first goal is to â€Å"engage in writing as a process that includes planning, revision, and editing based on feedback from peers and instructors.† The rhetorical analysis wasRead MoreThe Mysteries Of Molecular Medicine And Genetics916 Words   |  4 Pagesoutcome number 3:  Ã¢â‚¬Å"Use a flexible writing process and varied technologies to produce texts that address the expectations of the student’s disciplinary or professional discourse community in terms of claims, evidence, organization, format, style, rhetorical situation, strategies, and effects by drawing on an explicit understanding of the genre(s) being composed.†Ã‚  This learning outcome is focused towards writing, and my ORP best demonstrates how I successfully accomplished the task of producing writingRead MoreNot Just On Sunday At The United States Army838 Words   |  4 Pagesat Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia. I have learned and believe that theological learning is intellectual an d faith based and includes having personal theological bases of knowledge to lead. Exegetical is the critical explanation or analysis of texts of the Bible (Robbins, 1996), and Exegetical Research is an imperative aspect for Christians in the area of Strategic Leadership. Strategic leaders must be able to interpret, align, learn, decide, anticipate, and challenge our environmentRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of AinT I A Woman1035 Words   |  5 Pages[Yunus Sanni] English 1020 Campbell [6 oct 2017] Rhetorical Analysis of [â€Å"I Ain’t a woman† by Sojourner Truth] Aint I a Woman? ,the name given to a speech, delivered extemporaneously, by Sojourner Truth, (1797–1883),she gave this speech to the Women’s Convention of 1851, she speaks on the inequalities that women and blacks faced at that time in America. she uses rhetorical strategies in order to achieve a successful and powerful delivery of her message.Sojourner uses personal experiencesRead MoreAnalysis Of Designing For The Herd1988 Words   |  8 Pageschanging needs of the clients and the marketplace. They require awareness and a careful analysis of the problem and the unique user’s needs. To convey the message, key content areas include information organization, graphic design and usability. Similarly, in his other article, Supratextual Supra-textual Design: The Visual Rhetoric of Whole Documents Kostelnick addresses supra textual document design. Supra-textual design refers to the visual rhetoric, which encompasses the design of the document as

Description Of A New Duty Station - 1352 Words

1. Leadership: When I report to a new duty station there are a couple of rules I follow. I have learned and revised these rules over my twenty year career. Having learned that making drastic changes without knowing the current process is detrimental to the unit and to the moral of our members, I first observe and try to understand before changes are implemented. If one thing I have learned is that 99% of the time there are always a reasons behind those processes and that the other 1% is the process that was implemented out of a reaction to a situation. Upon arriving at my current duty station, it was not any different, process were in place that were exactly what they needed at the time, there were also other processes that were†¦show more content†¦In his eyes he was an excellent leader and he would routinely let everyone know how good of a leader he was, don’t get me wrong he had his moments but they were few and far between. Another observation I made was in how t his officer interacted with his Chief’s, again do as I say not as I do. As soon as I arrived the first conversation this officer and I had was in reference to two of the Chief’s on the hangar. He proceeded to tell me how these two Chiefs were hurting the hangar deck and how they were a â€Å"cancer† to our junior members. Luckily this is the type of situation where I never pass judgment until I have the opportunity to observe for myself. After a few days at the unit I observed another very strange occurrence, this same officer would routinely come to meetings in his civilian or workout clothes, something that I will not tolerate. I observed this behavior a couple of occasions and I decide to confront the situation, I brought it to the attention of this person and it stopped for a couple of months. A couple of months pass and the behavior returned, this time I spoke directly to his supervisor and found that he had been doing this his whole tour there. Unacceptabl e, once again do as I say not as I do. After speaking to his supervisor and making it clear that this behavior was unacceptable especially for an officer, he was given a stern talking to and he did not revert to

The Team That Wasnt free essay sample

Moving from New York City to the Midwest, Eric Holt has recently taken a new job as the director of strategy at a regional glass manufacturer named FireArt Inc. The CEO of the company, Jack Derry, has tasked Eric with developing a comprehensive plan for the company’s strategic realignment which needs to be implemented and working within the next six months. Eric has put together a team of the top six managers, one from each division, to accomplish this task. Unfortunately for Eric and his team, after the first four meetings, there has been little progress towards their goal. The lack of progress is not due to an insufficient amount of knowledge by each manager, but rather their inability to work together as a cohesive team. The team is dysfunctional, lacking structure from the start. Eric did not implement an organized decision making process. Eric also did not attempt to discuss psychological contracts or meta-contracts with the team in order to lay out expectations. We will write a custom essay sample on The Team That Wasnt or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Eric may have falsely presumed that everyone was as experienced as he when it came to teamwork. He became anchored with information Jack gave him prior to the first team meeting. Through the first four meetings each team member was focusing solely on the groups he or she directs, and each seemed to be pursuing his or her own agenda; the team has been employing an advocacy approach to their decision making. Eric has attributed much of the problem to Randy Louderback, the director of sales, who has continuously projected negativity to the team process and to other team members. Although valued in his industry knowledge and analytic thinking, he has clearly been a disruptive force. Eric does not effectively communicate with Randy or the team to deal with these issues. Upon confronting Randy on his actions in the third meeting, team members stormed out of the room angered and frustrated. At the surface of the problem are Randy’s uncooperative actions. However, the contributing and underlying problem lies in the way the team has been guided in the time leading up to, and including, this fourth meeting. Section 2: Problems One of the initial problems in this team dynamic was the anchoring trap. Jack brought Eric into the glass company with beliefs that anchored Eric’s expectations. Before Eric started working with the team, Jack highlighted Randy as having â€Å"the best mind† at FireArt. Randy was identified as the star from which all great ideas would come. Eric’s initial information about Randy was that he would be the â€Å"idea guy,† the one with â€Å"all the answers. † When Jack said, â€Å"Randy is the future of this company† Eric’s expectations soared. He quickly believed that Randy would be the team player that he was looking for. Eric did not communicate or enforce his decision making process and meeting structure. When the team was brainstorming solutions, Randy interrupted and belittled other team members’ ideas by saying, â€Å"Let’s just do everything, why don’t we, including redesign the kitchen sink! This brought the meeting to an abrupt end. Additionally, competition within the team seemed to exist. Eric’s team used the advocacy approach to decision making. When teams follow the advocacy process, the participants approach decision making as a contest (Garvin and Roberto 2). The director of manufacturing presented a plan that involved how the manufacturing department could expedite its processes while reducing raw materials costs. The distribution director suggested accelerating shipping and delivery times. The head of the art department pushed for adding more artists and more innovative designs as the solution. Participants were passionate for their position, making it impossible to remain objective, and hence they did not spend time debating or considering all of the ideas. The team also lacks explicit balanced psychological contracts and meta-contracts. One problem for Eric occurred during the creation of the team. He created an explicit psychological contract in which he prepared structure and guidelines for the group’s discussions, disagreements, and decisions. However, Eric never introduced this contract to the group, preventing the possibility of mutual agreement or voluntary acceptance, which are key elements of psychological contracts (Rousseau 120-121). Most of the team members accepted a non-formal form of a psychological contract, including expectations of being punctual and acting with respect for one another. However there is considerable evidence of the team not abiding by the rules of this contract, or any meta-contract. One instance occurred when the group did not follow any structured plans for resolving disagreement, but instead chose to publicly confront Randy. Another problem is that this team does not function in the ideal way as depicted in a manner associated with the Model for Managing Psychological Contracts. This team reaches a â€Å"pinch point† each time a disruption occurs from Randy. With each disruption, there is anxiety (experienced by Eric), resentment (the team towards Randy), and uncertainty (the entire team not knowing what to expect next from Randy). This process results in a team â€Å"crunch point† at which point the team continues to function without addressing the problems (Kolb, Osland and Rubin 9). Eric’s ineffective communication has contributed to the team’s issues as well. Eric missed timely opportunities to meet with each team member individually before calling everyone together as a group. Eric knew that the managers at FireArt were not accustomed to working in team environments and even anticipated facing some issues when the team met. Despite this foresight, Eric did not make an effort to actively listen to each member in order to find out where he or she was coming from or in order to communicate his expectations for the team process. To further complicate the communication issue, Eric exhibited feedback-avoiding behavior while managing the team as a conflict avoider. This behavior took effect during the first meeting. Even though he recognized that Randy was inhibiting the team’s progress throughout the first few meetings, Eric delayed giving any sort of negative feedback to Randy, letting the problem go unaddressed into the fourth meeting. In fact, Eric gave Randy the benefit of the doubt throughout the first three meetings, reasoning that Randy’s insightful comments counteracted his negativism. By not addressing Randy’s behavior immediately and privately, the team’s frustration grew. Furthermore, when Eric finally decided to give feedback to Randy, he discussed Randy’s attitude openly with the group. This decision led other team members to jump in to argue with and attack Randy, and resulted in the abrupt end of yet another chaotic team meeting. Section 3: Recommendations In order to address the anchoring trap into which he has fallen, Eric must avoid giving too much weight to initial information. The key is for him to be aware of the dangers of anchoring. Eric must be open-minded and seek differing viewpoints and opinions in order to break out of the trap. Eric should be patient in forming his opinion on Randy, and not rely solely on his first-impression (Hammond, Keeny and Raiffa 3). Rather than the advocacy approach that the team is currently following, Eric must promote an inquiry process to decision making. Inquiry decision-making is a team effort as opposed to a contest. The purpose is to engage in healthy debate so as to test and evaluate decisions. The participants are encouraged to actively think and contribute (Garvin and Roberto 2). In order to move quickly from an advocacy approach to one of inquiry, Eric must balance three critical factors within his team: conflict, consideration and closure. Cognitive or substantive conflict is healthy; it involves disagreements over ideas and assumptions. Eric should structure the team meetings to encourage healthy debates. Each idea presented by the team should be discussed and challenged. This style exposes weaknesses in existing ideas, and helps to develop new ones. This process encourages critical thinking without challenging team members on a personal level. Eric should illustrate consideration by allowing each team member to express his or her ideas with an opportunity for discussion. Doing so will ensure that the team feels all ideas are taken seriously and treated fairly. Perceived fairness will make the team members feel that they are respected and their ideas are considered equally, resulting in an increase performance and a decrease in barriers. Once Eric creates an environment in which healthy debates occur, he will need to manage closure of that debate, ensuring all team members have had a chance to express their ideas, however not allowing the discussion to hit grid lock. By implementing an inquiry process, the team should be able to successfully come up with multiple strategies that are debated, resulting in a solution for the strategic realignment of FireArt (Garvin and Roberto 2-7). Another tactic to improve the team’s structure is for Eric to institute an explicit balanced psychological contract with which all team members are in agreement. When involved in the planning and organizing of their functions, there are fewer chances for team members to breach their contracts. This process will ensure that the contracts are voluntary and mutual. Employing agreed upon, explicit, balanced psychological contracts will help to increase the predictability of the team’s interactions, improve the team’s performance, and will specifically increase Randy’s buy-in of the team environment (Rousseau 123). It is also critical for the team is to create a clear meta-contract. This meta-contract should include the steps to be taken should anyone perceive a violation (Rousseau 125-126). Ideally, each time the team reaches a â€Å"pinch point† they will to return to stability and plan a renegotiation of the contract. A well developed, agreed-upon meta-contact will allow the team to proceed more effectively when reaching â€Å"pinch points† and thus prevent the problems that arise from hitting â€Å"crunch points† (Kolb, Osland and Rubin 9). In order to address the team’s communication issues, it is recommended that Eric seek out each team member individually. This should have been done prior to the first team meeting. Regardless of this fact, he must sit everyone down to discuss each other’s expectations. He must actively listen during these one-on-one sessions. That is, Eric must maintain eye contact, ask open-ended questions, put each team member at ease, and let them express themselves fully (Culp and Smith 17-21). By actively listening, he can tailor the team meetings to meet each person’s expectations as well as their listening, working, and contribution styles. This is especially important when is comes to addressing Randy. Furthermore, Eric and Randy’s one-on-one meeting may help curb Randy’s disruptive behavior. Eric may gain insight into what the problem really is and along with Randy, establish a solution. Eric seems to be a conflict avoider. He has avoided directly and individually addressing Randy. This negative feedback avoiding behavior has allowed team meetings to get out of hand. Eric should structure the meetings so that they are not venting sessions. These meetings hold the key to their futures. He must make it clear that they have an overall company realignment goal to accomplish. Beyond this task-level feedback, Eric must also provide motivational-level feedback. It is pertinent that Eric manage his psychological and physical distance with Randy and the other team members. He must also manage the timing and location of the negative feedback he gives. Instead of calling Randy out in front of the entire team, Eric should sit-down with Randy privately and iron-out the problem. The timing of this discussion, however, needs to correspond with Randy’s negative behavior. Going forward however, Eric needs to set a new precedent by directly and quickly giving negative feedback and exploring ways to orrect and learn from any mistakes. By following these tactics for improved communication Eric can manage any feedback avoiding behavior and reduce existing feedback gaps (Moss and Sanchez 37-41). In conclusion, Eric’s team is out of control. They have become victims of poor decision making processes and traps, broken psychological contracts, and ineffective communication. It is recommended that Eric take control of the situation by starting new and applying better decision making processes. Psychological contracts and their related meta-contracts must be renegotiated and voluntarily agreed upon. Eric must communicate his expectations and listen to each team members’ expectations more actively and effectively. Lastly, he must provide feedback that is timely and encourages learning and growth. By redesigning his approach, Eric can make â€Å"The Team that Wasn’t,† become â€Å"The Team that Is! †

Life In The 1900S Essays (1212 words) - Wright Brothers,

Life In The 1900'S Life in the 1900's was depressing and was an era filled with extremely hard and strenous work that didn't offer any future for the average canadian in doing better. If you were an average wage earner you would be virtually stuck in the same job for the rest of your life, while rich maintained their wealth mainly caused by the low taxes. Living conditions were poor for average canadians and even worse for the arriving immigrants. At this time some of the modern convienences were just being invented and even if it were for sale only the extremely rich had the option of purchasing the items. Sports being very new, in the aspect of it being organized was small time compared to present day. Travelling required time and was uncomfortable. Only the rich could have the luxurious accomadations for those long journeys. Many jobs were available to most people but you were under constant scrutiny while working and would have to be willing to do any thing the boss wanted. I believe my friends and I would most likely resent and despise it if we had to live in the 1900's. During the 1900's horses played a significant role in the everyday life. A horse drawn carriage would bring a docter to the house of where a baby would be born. A hearse was pulled by horses to the cemetery when somebody died. Farmers used them to pull their ploughs while town dwellers kept them for transportation around town. Horses puled delivery wagons for businesses such as bakery, dairy, and coal company. Horses pulled fire engines through the streets in a fire emergency. The bicycle was widely accepted by canadians because of its easy maintence compared to a horse. The bike allowed an option of transportation. The bicycle also gave a sense of freedom to virtually anybody willing to learn. Henry Ford revolutionized the world we live in by inventing the horseless carriage, if it had not been for him, instead of taking the GO bus in the morning we'd be riding a horse named Wanda. Not only did his inventio n offer a method of transportation to the public, but it helped with our emergency services such as fire engines, police cars, and ambulances. Now we have a large variety of cars to choose from varying in size and price. He also brought a large profitable industry to North America...The car industry. Back then there weren't many problems that they created. Today, we have our deteriorating ozone layer, poisonous chemicals that come from exhaust fumes (CO2)(Carbon Monoxide). Not to mention the traffic accidents, parking problems and traffic jams in downtown Toronto. 11 years previous to WW I Orville and Wilbur Wright made a successful flight in the first airplane at the beach of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Although the flight only lasted 12 seconds it would change the way we see the world. The telephone allowed the houseneeds to be satisfied without leaving they're homes. Women received an oppurtunity to work as a a switch board operator. I don't know if I can stress the importance of Marconi's invention enough. But I can say, that without it not only would there be no T.V. or radio there would be a lot of unemployed people right now(even more unemployed than now!!!). The reason for that is radio provides people with jobs such as DJ's, musical programmers etc. Also, radio is a major form of advertising, without it there would not be as many advertising agencies or as many positions in this field. Without T.V., advertising agencies would also face the same consequences. T.V. provides millions of people with employment in commercials, T.V. shows, and movies. Baseball was the most popular sport in the United States where the World Series began in 1903. Tom Longboat was born in Brantford, Ontario and was known for outrunning a horse over a 19 km coarse. He set a record of 2 hours, 24 min and 24 seconds when he ran the Boston Marathon. Jan 22/1901 Queen Victoria died at the age of 63 years. The Queens reign stretched across the globe. With her death came modernization. In the early 1900's horses were being